[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: sloan video
- Subject: Re: sloan video
- From: Andrew Rodenhiser
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 19:53:08
Natalie Foong <siryn\!/gate.maloca.com> postulated
}
}i've come up with another 'theory' :). most of the stuff that made it for
}the fave videos of all time..i think were voted on because of the song,
}more than the video. most of those videos were songs that made it big on
}the radio <college radio don't count! :)>. i mean, the songs are part of
Yeah, this goes along with my point that videos aren't generally
good enough to leave a lasting impression. Thus the teenyboppers
vote for the songs they like to hear, rather than the vids they like
to see. Apart from Primus, who have written a dozen better songs
than "Wynonna" but just because they dressed up in Energizer toy
suits the vid made the single sell. Creative maybe but obviously a
marketing tool for a perhaps weaker album musically. (c) 1996 Ron
Foley MacDonald, a superior bassist. <wit>
Any ideas why people who make good musical art can't also make good
visual art?
Or is it just because pop musicians don't make good musical art
either? <sarcasm>
Andrew
P.S. no, the spin the bottle vid I was referring to was the Sloan
one. <smile>