Yet another post about the ECMA's

• Subject: Yet another post about the ECMA's
• From: LEMONZINGER <astral\!/auracom.com>
• Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 18:06:55 -0400 (AST)
• Sender: sloannet-request\!/bluenose.canadaweb.com

Hi everyone.

   I just have to say that I am very dissappointed (I know that's spelled
wrong) about the ECMA's. I saw a list of everything in the paper today, and
there are so many categories that Sloan could have been a part of but
aren't: Entertainers of the year, Album, Song, Video, and Songwriter. I
can't believe that Natalie MacMaster was nominated for best video!! They
must have felt sorry for her or something. I have never even seen it! I
didn't even know that she had a video!!!! And I'm not even going to START
about Kim Stockwood!!!! (No offence to anyone here that might like Natalie &
Kim!)

  For those of you who don't know yet, Sloan are nominated for Best Group,
Pop-Rock Artists, and Alternative Artists.

                                  Sorry, this was probably unnecessary.
                                                                 KELLI

• Prev by Date: getting bands to play...
• Next by Date: [no subject]
• Previous by thread: getting bands to play...
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another post about the ECMA's